Editorial Policy
This page explains how content on aitoolsor.com is produced, reviewed and corrected.
How tools are tested
Every tool published here is used against real files and real inputs before it goes live, including the awkward cases: multi-hundred-image batches, unusual page sizes, files large enough to strain browser memory. Where a tool fails, the failure is documented on its page rather than omitted.
How guides are researched
Guides are written from primary sources — official documentation, standards, and direct testing — rather than by summarising other articles. Where a claim depends on something that varies (a school district’s grading policy, a browser’s format support), we say what varies instead of asserting one version as universal.
Use of AI in production
We write about AI tools, so we are explicit about our own use of them. AI assistance may be used for drafting, outlining and code scaffolding. Every published page is reviewed and edited by a human who is accountable for its accuracy, and every tool is manually tested before release. We do not publish unreviewed generated text.
Corrections
If a page is wrong, we fix it. Substantive corrections — anything that changes the meaning or the advice — are noted on the page with the date. Typos and formatting are fixed silently.
To report an error, use the contact page.
Affiliate links and sponsorship
- Some guides contain affiliate links. If we earn a commission from a link, it is disclosed on that page.
- Placement in a review or roundup cannot be purchased.
- No company has editorial review or approval over anything published here.
- The tools themselves carry no affiliate links and no sponsorship.
Independence
Where we recommend a paid product, we also name the best free option, including where that free option is good enough that the paid one is unnecessary. Where our own tool competes with a product we mention, we say so.